Note Anachronism:
(B-time=8:07)for flip flop of vision thing,
or perspective on index and archive sequence.
Link below indicates mo'real time.
The Team? or[!] [DBA]
Randi Rhodes
Lawrence[*] O'Donnell
Stephanie Miller
Thom Hartmann
Ed Schultz[Update 9-23-11]
Norman Gold-Man
Thom Hartmann
The Music?
ACTUALLY THE G'Ribble?(a test of search/index slash references)***
G'Ribble
Back to The "One Thing".
Place Holder?
Who needs Brackets?
The Honeymoon is Over?
What's so funny...
The Straw Bear
"Trust but Verify"
QCON:Truthout
Proof of Process
MOORE TRUTH IN MEDIA
The G'Ribble?
Actually I end in pun(Or rather Satire), but this was a text* of sorts(literally), of "G'Ribble" in the (Blogspot)Search Box in the upper left corner of this blog.
It was a test in two ways. To see if there is any reliability of the search engine over time. Of course editing would influence that accuracy. But also to see if there was any mess age above and beyond the search, in the calm pend I um**.
*(sp!) typo/ra test [?]ra=read as[!]
** see test/text/time/tangent not to mention T(t)ruth.
*** Grand Ribble: Whereas D'Ribble might be obvious, it is not so simple. It might be a de-ribble or an un-ribble, or a Democratic Ribble, which seems like hard work, now that I think about it, but never(that I can tell) just trickle-down.
[*]bingo "that's not smart, it's not right"
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query vision thing. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query vision thing. Sort by date Show all posts
Thursday, September 01, 2011
Friday, June 08, 2012
GPS Cross Rhodes
Not to be unkind, but certainly inkind.
Global Partisan Shifting. Or Graphic Pundit Sorting.
Not exactly a vision thing, but more nearly a ge-oh-metric.
Speaking of "Perspective" the NG word of the day(yesterday), I suggest "scales" for today.
The scale that determines rulers, waits and balances, not to mention fish and eye impairments.
Speak of the hockey puck.
[Segue "War on Soda" The un-COLA and Bubble-up?]
Not to mention Martin Bashir, Fight Club yet to rant. Romney mocks jobs list. If the private sector has turned around what will Raw Money do about it. Ouch Super Bowl metaphor.
Global Partisan Shifting. Or Graphic Pundit Sorting.
Not exactly a vision thing, but more nearly a ge-oh-metric.
Speaking of "Perspective" the NG word of the day(yesterday), I suggest "scales" for today.
The scale that determines rulers, waits and balances, not to mention fish and eye impairments.
Speak of the hockey puck.
[Segue "War on Soda" The un-COLA and Bubble-up?]
Not to mention Martin Bashir, Fight Club yet to rant. Romney mocks jobs list. If the private sector has turned around what will Raw Money do about it. Ouch Super Bowl metaphor.
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
Lt. Watada: "Unbecoming" Mistrial
“Very interesting" Oops, wrong accent or show.
“I see nothing" from Hogan’s Heroes may be the one I was stretching for.
My commentary has to do with whose perspective or spin is taken off from. As in “here comes the judge": "saying the soldier did not fully understand a document he signed admitting to elements of the charges." And this take from other participants .
My perspective? Should not intention count? And what was the intention of the war? And can this ever stop spinning if "intention" is not on the table, but the war was all about preemption of intentions. I am not sure just who understood what about the charge but the defense put it all on the table, and it was "not a matter that can be settled in military court."
NOT A MATTER THAT CAN BE SETTLED IN MILITARY COURT?
I believe that the 1st and 3rd bold are from "Laugh In" or similar times, but that is not to make light of the seriousness of our "defining" times, as in Bush's ideological run around the dictionary of about all that matters.
But as you can see from the vision thing, it may not work if you focus, and I could be wrong about the links. NOT EXACTLY BUT...
NOT A MATTER? THERE IS NO OFFENSE IF THERE CAN BE NO DEFENSE.
Ow! The irony of circular intention or "the yellow brick road". Or maybe it is that there are only three branches of government and conscience is where principles are found or lost or the battle ground we should be on.
“I see nothing" from Hogan’s Heroes may be the one I was stretching for.
My commentary has to do with whose perspective or spin is taken off from. As in “here comes the judge": "saying the soldier did not fully understand a document he signed admitting to elements of the charges." And this take from other participants .
My perspective? Should not intention count? And what was the intention of the war? And can this ever stop spinning if "intention" is not on the table, but the war was all about preemption of intentions. I am not sure just who understood what about the charge but the defense put it all on the table, and it was "not a matter that can be settled in military court."
NOT A MATTER THAT CAN BE SETTLED IN MILITARY COURT?
I believe that the 1st and 3rd bold are from "Laugh In" or similar times, but that is not to make light of the seriousness of our "defining" times, as in Bush's ideological run around the dictionary of about all that matters.
But as you can see from the vision thing, it may not work if you focus, and I could be wrong about the links. NOT EXACTLY BUT...
NOT A MATTER? THERE IS NO OFFENSE IF THERE CAN BE NO DEFENSE.
Ow! The irony of circular intention or "the yellow brick road". Or maybe it is that there are only three branches of government and conscience is where principles are found or lost or the battle ground we should be on.
Thursday, February 23, 2012
The Vision Thing
Statistics are people too[!]
No, I don't mean that, but they are a communication of something, from the Center for American Progress* If corporations are people, what are the charts saying, in these graphs. Maybe that Obama or the Democratic congress were the savior. Not that unnatural selection(Cherry Pickinghatchet jobs, by George[no Ben]) may be able to tell a different** story.
Some have said the market has some form of intelligence, Adam Smith aside, if that is the case the Obama was the cure for what Ailes the economy. Or it could just be a cycle, NOT!***
** accidental find
(I might suggest closing your eyes for this clip, and a ear of caution on the next.)
Monday, September 19, 2011
Civil Disobedience...
I am not calling for it, but googled it, and found no mention of the current case, not that it might be called something else.
My one and only point(well...2 or three)is(R) that 1) those that partake actually have a line to cross, 2) they have consequences for crossing any lines, and 3) that government is also bound by such clarity.
Speaking of whatchamacallit...what is the flip flop of Civil Disobedience? Criminal Pathology(I mean following)?
[9-20-11 Update: Note Pathology Pun ]
[Not to mention ge oh me trick segue. BTW: It is a vision thing. No Burning Bush, but... "bad faith" v. good math Speaking of Highways: I originally mis-heard the president. I thought he said "It's MAD! Which is Bane or...see di-mentionism.]
My one and only point(well...2 or three)is(R) that 1) those that partake actually have a line to cross, 2) they have consequences for crossing any lines, and 3) that government is also bound by such clarity.
Speaking of whatchamacallit...what is the flip flop of Civil Disobedience? Criminal Pathology(I mean following)?
[9-20-11 Update: Note Pathology Pun ]
[Not to mention ge oh me trick segue. BTW: It is a vision thing. No Burning Bush, but... "bad faith" v. good math Speaking of Highways: I originally mis-heard the president. I thought he said "It's MAD! Which is Bane or...see di-mentionism.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)